Introduction to Psychological Testing Paper Essay

The case of psychology is unitary of those broad and exciting fields. Though confused psychologists head for the hills to work in a respective(a) array of fields integrity of the common expectations that they all sh be is that they all study behavior and beau its results to some specific barments. Psychological tests argon some of the common tests that be carried out in this field of psychology. The tests be carried and analyzed then the results ar interpreted in such a way so as to attain different attributes for various one-on-ones.One of the interesting things is that these results may start in accordance with various factors which may either have a positive or negative impact on the tests. These tests have tack their way into a number of applications with individuals be tested to determine whether they are up to task to ascertain their levels of performance in a diverse array of fields. The term test in psychology interrogatory is one that has to be defined firs t in order to determine the workability of the extremity and the results that should be expected.According to a renowned psychologist Anatasi (1997) the term test as used in the field of psychology, is defined as an objective and regularise measure of a exemplification of behavior. This very definition tends to get down three core elements of psychology testing. The term objective tends to generally tumble the idea on how the test score is interpreted meaning that it is as a result of an objective criterion instead of subjective discernment by the examiner.The term standardized in the definition means that the results get out be uniform independent of any qualified examiner. The term sample in the definition shows us that the test is drawn from previous salt away inferences and results. Most of the psychological tests are categorized into a compartmentalisation of radicals depending on the results and the individuals involved. These tests may be administered to an individua l that is one person at a conviction and they are known as individual tests as compared to group tests which are administered to more(prenominal) that an individual.See more how to start an essayFrom time in memorial various psychologists have used three briny criterias to distinguish various abilities that individuals possess. The tests may differ in that they may be grouped as either ability or character tests. A character test is described as one that is related to the overt and covert dispositions of the individual (Kaplan and Saccuzzo, 2008). This means that these grammatical cases of tests will generally measure an individuals typical behavior. These types of tests will then be shared out into two distinctive groups of either structured or objective personality tests.The structured type of tests require the individual to choose from a variety of two options such as true and false or yes and no. Objective personality tests on the other hand are more complicated in that an i ndividual is required to provide spontaneous responses. This type of testing generally assumes that the individual will tend to produce ridiculous characteristics. The main concept behind these tests is actually to evaluate differences or variations that various individuals may exhibit.One of the assumptions that these tests tend to be pegged upon is that the resultants are actually the genuinely differences among individuals. With this it can then be said that the more or less important aspect of testing is to generally differentiate among those individuals taking the tests (Domino and Domino, 2006). The three, aptitude, feat and light are used to determine the types of tests to be performed so as to determine their floor in an individual.Achievement in contrast to aptitude refers to previous learnedness while aptitude refers to the potential that an individual inhibits to do more. Intelligence on the other hand is distinguished from both achievement and aptitude in the sens e that it refers to the general potential an individual has to solve problems, adapt to environments and improvement from experience. The three however are believed to be interrelated in one way or another and a term that has been coined up to describe this situation is the term human ability (Kaufman and Kaufman, 2004).Two of these tests achievement and aptitude tests have found their way in educational and most of the times employment institutions where they are used to deduce an individuals ability. These tests are used to determine how much an individual knows about a certain aspects such as calculations, spellings or masterly of certain textile objects such as practices and the like. Intelligence tests on the other hand picture to measure an individuals ability to basically understand the gentlemans gentleman and its environment analyze its functionality and use the acquired knowledge to improve the quality of the individuals life.A renowned psychologist by the name Alfred Whitehead (1929) describes intelligence as having the potential to enables the individual to profit by error without being slaughtered by it. However the measurement of this ability has come under fill up scrutiny with critics arguing that most tests do not provide surface cut results or fail out rightly. The field of psychological testing is mainly governed by two major principles that is hardihood and reliability.The term validity as it used in this field means that the tests and results are helpful in whatever the reason they are carried on. On more proficient terms the term can be said to represent the score in which certain inferences or interpretations can be considered to be curb (Kaplan and Saccuzzo, 2008). Reliability on the other hand refers to the degree in which the tests and results obtained are free from errors. It refers to the accuracy, consistency, dependability of the test results.Although the concept of psychological testing is suitable an important phenom enon in todays modern world, controversies have in some cases dogged the otherwise noble idea. One of the aspects that come into forgather is that most of the tests are usually administered by counselors and if the training is not fit then the validity and reliability of the tests may be somehow substandard. The issuance of ethics also comes into play and when monetary aspects are considered then the guinea pig of ethics may just be thrown out of the window.This is especially true considering the number of individuals especially in the internet who purport to be offering an array of tests which their authenticity does not weigh the balance. Some loving and theoretical issues have arisen with the fragile issue of race finding its caterpillar tread to those who vehemently criticize this lick. However since nothing will ever be perfect, a compromise is often reached whereby the positives of this process outweigh the disadvantages and thus the process is preferred and applied in many institutions.